Private Servers
- Thread starter Hellgater
- Start date
There are 4 servers (EU/NA/CN/RU) run by the developers of Bannerlord Online.
You will not be able to run a private server. Nor are there any plans to allow this in the future.
You will not be able to run a private server. Nor are there any plans to allow this in the future.
There absolutely needs to be plans made as soon as possible if no plan has been planned for this most needed feature!
Bannerlord Online is being developed as a MMO style. As development progresses, more features will deviated from single player. Having private servers, specially small ones, would not be ideal with the mod.
I agree to disagree! 100%!
Doing such a thing WOULD affect the income generated by the dynamics of this AWESOME mod, but otherwise would strongly enrich the game play value for a lot of players!
The devs have created something that all M&B players have wanted since the game was originally released, the ability to co op the campaign map together.
I have no problem with them cashing in on such a unique and well executed idea, but for me, the logic of your statement does not explain away the lack of ability to make this mod available for players to run the same files on a server of thier choice!
Doing such a thing WOULD affect the income generated by the dynamics of this AWESOME mod, but otherwise would strongly enrich the game play value for a lot of players!
The devs have created something that all M&B players have wanted since the game was originally released, the ability to co op the campaign map together.
I have no problem with them cashing in on such a unique and well executed idea, but for me, the logic of your statement does not explain away the lack of ability to make this mod available for players to run the same files on a server of thier choice!
When you're trying to create a player driven game, the last thing you want is to spread the players.
Having private servers sounds nice, if it was closer to single player with plenty of AI to replace the players.
The end goal is that players will harvest resources for crafting (smithing/food, later siege weapons). It would get stale pretty fast without a large playerbase.
Having private servers sounds nice, if it was closer to single player with plenty of AI to replace the players.
The end goal is that players will harvest resources for crafting (smithing/food, later siege weapons). It would get stale pretty fast without a large playerbase.
Since you put it that way, I do agree there! It would get old fast with nothing but looters n such
It's going to get real old real fast when some giga chad rolls my starter clan with a well established kingdom of armies tho
The unfortunate risk of online. Diplomacy is important but can't always help you.
Most clans are open to diplomacy, but some just want to see the world burn.
A very interesting outlook in fairness to both the Dev's and the Community as a whole.
Granted the Dev's hold final say and can "speculate" on the communities needs as they go. But after playing for almost two weeks and watching waves of people either joining or rage quitting due to getting into Clans (a key point of endgame material) seems that the community favors those who started earlier than gaining new members.
I've seen some awesome MMO systems in place that even bigger games haven't tried, and I'm impressed to say the least. But for the sake of a growing community, it looks to be wise to make some form of compromise in the far future when things have actually grown.
if private communities can't be formed (assuming the reason is wanting the ability to have a fresh start on the economy and army balances) perhaps a system of updates and resets. Maybe compensating those who play between resets with with coin in relation to what they've accomplished or even own.
Granted the Dev's hold final say and can "speculate" on the communities needs as they go. But after playing for almost two weeks and watching waves of people either joining or rage quitting due to getting into Clans (a key point of endgame material) seems that the community favors those who started earlier than gaining new members.
I've seen some awesome MMO systems in place that even bigger games haven't tried, and I'm impressed to say the least. But for the sake of a growing community, it looks to be wise to make some form of compromise in the far future when things have actually grown.
if private communities can't be formed (assuming the reason is wanting the ability to have a fresh start on the economy and army balances) perhaps a system of updates and resets. Maybe compensating those who play between resets with with coin in relation to what they've accomplished or even own.